Anche Alessandro Barbero voterà NO al referendum sulla legge Nordio. E lo spiega così.

so I decided to make this video in which I explain the reasons why I wanted to do it. And that's why I'm a little bit, because this has never become a political battle. A travestra, a leftist, a part of a rightist government that wants to reform it and a leftist who tries to hide it, and it doesn't seem to be my fault to intervene against this kind of thing. Of course, I'm a leftist, and this is what all of us all know. But just because there is something that I say to everyone, even if I'm wrong, you know what I'm saying? But then I'm studying a little bit about it, and this is something that I want to say to you about this. In the meantime, I'm going to do a "no" on the separation of careers between the public ministers and the judges. The separation of fact is already there. Now, the magistrate that takes service decides in which of the two roles to work and can change a single lap in life and little by little they do it. In the center of the reform, there is the destruction of the upper consignation of the magistrate as it was wanted by the assembly of these two. And now let's say that the CSM will be like this, the upper consignation of the magistrate and they have the government of the magistrates, with the function of also disciplining them. That is, doing something that before, under the fascist regime, was the minister of justice. And the minister, that is, the government, that was political, that surveyed the magistrate and that, in the case, sanctioned him. The parents of these two were very good, that the separation of powers is indispensable for democracy. That the citizens are not safe, if they find themselves in inquiries and judges that take orders from the government and that they can be punished from the government. For this reason, the Constitution is pre-read that the CSM is composed for two thirds of the magistrates to coordinate and let you go with them. And for a third of the professors of jurisprudence and lawyer of great experience, the so-called member-like members and the letter of the parliament. The CSM, the guarantee that the magistrate will be involved with the political power, to listen to the reasons of the government, but it will be free in its elections. I should not say the orders. The reform, the reform in De Gorice, the upper consignation of the magistrate, in short, because it is pre-readable, one for the judges and one for the public ministers. And that at the top of the CSM, there is another organ disciplinary, separate organ, also composed by the representatives of the magistrates and member of the political power. But above all, the reform is pre-readable that in all these organs, the "togati" members, as it is said, are the ones that were represented by the magistrates and that they were finally elected by colleagues. And well, the reform is pre-readable that they were taken to court. The justification for this misuse of Pazesca that is not used in any organ of great responsibility, the justification that the magistrate is politicized, which was considered horrible. And that when the magistrate elected, there were representatives of his various correnties, and this would be avoided to me, but to me, to many. It seems that a CSM, both, three organists, where the members of the magistrates are released, while the government continues to choose those who do not like him. And well, it seems to me that these organisms will be for the sake of something, the organism where the weight of the political component will be very superior. Where, in fact, the government could, again, as in an authoritarian state, give orders to the magistrates and pull them away from the sanctions. Now, of course, those who would like to reform can say, as, in fact, many say, "no, what is going on is like this, and this is just what we want. A modern and efficient state must function like this. I think it's different. And for this I would say no. And in the end, I decided that I could have felt that I tried to explain publicly the reasons why I will do it.