Controfferta sì o controfferta no? Il tema è: perché quella conversazione non è avvenuta prima? Normalizziamo il parlare di retribuzione prima di arrivare alle dimissioni. #controfferta #retribuzione #hr #leadership #lavoro

"Alpha asks me what I think of the controversies and I answer to the absolute opposite." Personally, most of the times I do not try to make controversies to decide to put themselves for very simple reasons. Point number one, if the company can afford to give you that retribution and it is enough that you deserve not to expect your emissions to recognize it. Because the tempism in certain cases is more like an exaggeration, according to me. It means that the value is already there, you have seen it, but it has become important only because it is there to give you. So, no. Point number two, if a person changes, because he does not find himself well with the company, with the values, with the processes, with the way he works, the money in addition does not solve that problem. They can be anesthetized to the maximum, but often you know, I send the emissions only for a few months. Then there is another topic that is important to me, very often the satisfaction is purely economic and instead. And so many people, instead of talking openly with their manager, or with the car, are directly on the market. And this thing for me is a sin. Pay attention that I am not saying that people do not have the pulse of the market because they serve to understand how to position themselves. I am talking about that people who directly come to put themselves without even talking. This because work, we ban them to the maximum, is pre-station in exchange for money. And if the company, during the year, will continue to be objective, performance and responsibility. Why should not it be so legitimate for a person to say that my responsibilities are changed? Or my impact is growing in this and this other way. So I retain that my profile has been valued on the market differently. It is very normal. We normalize the transparent communication on the distribution, also because it is too little, as you know, it will be read, so we habitually do it in a constructive way, because the company also comes.