Always clap back #winterolympics #eileengu

Also, do you see, um, these as two silver's gained or two gold's lost? We need to talk about this. This is because of contextual bias. Two silver's gained or two gold's lost. Let that sink in. What people don't talk about is when you're incredibly talented and successful, you are now under the microscope enjudgment of people who are outside your lane. This is where Eileen goo is. She's in a place that I call contextual expertise. It's also where all the other Olympic athletes are. They understand how much work and time goes into perfecting a skill, especially something that no one's ever done before. And this is the reporter, as well as you and I. Similar to that reporter, we are watching the Olympics from a perspective of ignorance. We do not have full knowledge and understanding of the amount of work, training, and expertise that go into perfecting that skill. However, as an audience, we feel perfectly comfortable judging a successful athlete when they make a mistake. Eileen didn't make a mistake. She's being judged for not being more successful from a contextual generalist perspective, which is kind of silly. The deception of an expert making something looks so graceful and easy to the point the audience think they can judge and also possibly do the same thing is exactly that deception. So my opinion on this interview is that the best questions doesn't just come from understanding the respondents' contacts, but also understanding your own. And I really don't think he would have asked a man that. She could have easily just not answered it, but no one would have learned anything from that.