Más información del Diplomado en teoría del delito en la web lpderecho.pe #teoriadeldelito #romychang #dolo #lpderecho #diplomado #derechopenal

we are going to distinguish between three kinds of pain and two types of improvements. The direct pain is the second degree of co-sequence in the areas and the eventual pain. And at the level of improvement, there is no inconsistency. And what is the difference between the direct pain of the first degree, the second degree of co-sequence in the eventual pain? Well, first of all, the subject is represented that something bad may happen and wants that bad to happen. I feel that if I go with a girl and start playing her part of the sentence, I'm going to give you a lesson, I'm going to give you a lesson and I want you to be a bad guy. In case something happens, right? I don't know, I don't know much. I give you direct pain. I give you direct pain. I represent that if you take a knife in the heart, you will die. And hopefully you die because I want you to die the pleasure. I give you direct pain. Well, that's right. In addition, I give you bad, bad, bad. Because more pain than that, you can see. That's why some jokes are in the world of academia, right? When, for example, I don't know if you want to do something bad, you can say, "Hey, when I tell you, I give you direct, I give you the thing." I mean, I totally prevent you from coming. Why? Because more pain than that, you can't. But there is another type of pain, the pain of consequences necessary or in the second grade. In this case, the subject is represented that something bad can happen. And what you want is that result in the measure in which with that result you will get another end, which is what you really look for. For example, I want to imagine killing an employee, but that he always goes with his back. And I realize that the only way to do it is to have him to be killing his back, because his back is always tense. So what I do is I give him a grenade. And with the grenade, good job, good job, good job, good job. To the employee, I am representing that he was throwing the grenade, he was going to kill him. Yes, he wanted to die at the employee. Yes, he wanted to die. That was my main objective, to save his back. I was going to say that if the grenade was going to die, yes, but he wanted to die, not so much, but, well, as a consequence of the story, if he had to die, he was going to die. He realizes, because I, if I could not kill the employee, that's all in the second grade. So in the second grade, vinculated to the first, you realize. And what is the eventual pain here that the problems are. In the eventual pain, the subject is represented that something bad can happen to him, he does not want that bad peace, that is the problem. But then, if he does not want and there is no will, why does it work as a pain? Because despite not wanting to import a raven, it shows an expression for the jury. Assume the result of the production, it gives the same. That's why I always listen to him, and when I got a taxi, I didn't listen to him, right? What are you going to do there, sir? I almost hit him, with the mirror, the lady is crossing, so that he goes there, he should not go there, how he is going to cross, look, look, half of the street, his problem. In those cases, the subject is represented that he can make damage to the lady, yes, he wants to damage the lady, no, but it gives him the same. Assume the result. And eye, this is because it is painful, because it is showing less pressure for the jury, clear the same, that's why it works as pain.