0:00 / 0:00

Do not harass or send hate comments to this person - "Highest IQ" holder proves God with math - #atheist #religion #agnostic #philosophy

@dissdeity
286.9K views25.3K likes2:39ENJun 15, 2026
475 words2715 characters46 sentencesReadability: Middle School

Transcript

"I am the world's highest IQ record holder, Younghoon Kim. I can't prove that God exists mathematically." "I bet they do. Just the three easy facts that even children learn in school. First, a line cannot start without a first point. Think about throwing a line on a piece of paper. In Geometry, every line has to begin with at least one point." In school, they literally teach you that in Geometry lines don't have a start or an end point. In Geometry, lines are definitionally infinite. You're literally just lying. "The same is true with existence. If there was never a starting point, then nothing could have never begun." Logically, this isn't a necessity. You're just assuming that this must be the case, but an infinite regress isn't a logical impossibility. But even then, a starting point still doesn't necessitate a God. "Second, you cannot cross an endless past. Imagine counting down. If you start at 10 and goal 9, 8, 7, all the way to zero, you can finish. But if I tell you to start at negative infinity and reach zero, you can never finish because there is no start, no first step." Your example here is just incoherent. You can't count down from infinity to zero because infinity isn't a real number. It's not an actual thing, so you can't even count down from infinity. But theoretically, say you could, not being able to finish it doesn't mean you can't traverse it at all. You can still traverse it. You would just never be able to finish it because there is no finish line. Even in your analogy of counting down from 9, instead of infinity down to zero, there is still an infinite amount of numbers between 8 and 9. There's an even larger amount of infinite numbers between zero and 9. That's still very clearly traversing infinity. Also, an infinite timeline isn't required for eternal existence. Eternal existence just means never coming into or out of existence. There could just be a finite timeline that exists eternally as a finite timeline. A timeline beginning to exist doesn't even make sense because that would mean time would pre-exist time, which is just incoherent. Multiplication shows that power must come from somewhere. Think about one times, one times, one times one. The answer is always one. Nothing changes unless you bring in a stronger number like two or three. Brother, there's no such thing as a stronger number. Like, what is a strong and weak number? That doesn't even make sense. And why multiplication? Why not addition? Then there's no need for a stronger number. This is just stupid. In conclusion, this is not a record occupier. He's very obviously a fraud, and his arguments are so laughably bad. Like, you just know he has literally no knowledge on the topic.