OUSMANE SONKO RECADRE FRANCE 24 SUR LA QUESTION DE L’HOMOSEXUALITÉ Lors de son entretien avec Ousmane Sonko, un journaliste de France 24 l'a interrogé sur la position du Sénégal concernant l'homosexualité. Sans détour, Ousmane Sonko a répondu que les lois sénégalaises relèvent de la souveraineté du pays et qu'elles doivent être définies par les Sénégalais eux-mêmes, et non sous l'influence de pressions extérieures. « Le Sénégal n'a pas à se justifier devant l'Occident », a-t-il notamment défendu, réaffirmant la position de son gouvernement sur ce sujet sensible. Cette séquence a rapidement suscité de nombreuses réactions sur les réseaux sociaux, entre soutien à la souveraineté nationale et critiques sur la question des droits humains. #OusmaneSonko #Sénégal #France24 #Actualité #Afrique #Politique #Débat #Souveraineté #News #StorytellingActu #LumiereSurLeMonde #AfriqueNews #Geopolitique

We will come to the issue of homosexuality, the law to double the penalties for homosexual relations. It has been a critical life in the United Nations, especially in France. There has been more than a hundred stations, we look at the mobile phones of people. Why is this homosexual issue legal? There is no homosexual issue, there is a law that is legalized, which is more than 30 years old. Do you think that it is a new law? No, it's the penalty that we have been forced, the law is there since the time of the President, or the government, with the same inclination of the practice of homosexuality. So the law has not come with us. There has been arrests in the past. In the past, there were arrests, and the arrests were taken before the death of the 16th of May for the homosexuality. And it is part of two things. The practice of homosexuality is associated with the voluntary transmission of the VAEH. The press is accidentally trying to hide its second aspect. The second aspect is extremely important, the voluntary transmission of the VAEH. So, it is legal that the country is open, it does not justify the VAE that it takes. Neither should the citizen, nor should anyone. The French told the law that the Comité des Droits de l'homme, the United Nations, considered as a "tentata" or a "drosime", a "tombat" on the hijab, on the vineyards. It's not our press, we are waiting the same for the same respect of the French and the West. We are in a country that has its religious beliefs, its cultural conviction, which is a sovereign country, which is legitimate, sovereign of me, on what it considers to be rejected by its society. And I think it has to do with the purpose of the VAEH. You did not come back to this law, you even talked about law enforcement? No, I did not come to this law, why? Because the French do not want it. If the VAEH is the law enforcement, it will be the law enforcement.