On s’est trompé sur notre vraie nature ? 🍖💥 L’analyse des os de nos ancêtres (Néandertaliens et premiers Sapiens) est sans appel : ils tiraient la grande majorité de leurs protéines des animaux. Notre corps et notre système digestif se sont façonnés à travers des centaines de milliers d’années de chasse, bien avant l’arrivée massive des glucides et de l’agriculture moderne. En gros : on est des carnivores avec une option omnivore. Et toi, tu penses qu'on a renié notre nature avec l'alimentation moderne ? Donne ton avis en commentaire ! 👇 #evolution #regimecarnivore #paleo #nutrition #anthropologie

Carnivor is built to be carnivor and hominivor facultative. Here is a scientific study on the isotopic of the European-European Neanderthalian and the first modern humans. I'll read it and I'll talk about the blabla. So, the isotopic proofs that in any case, the Neanderthalian Neanderthalian were carnivores at the level. Did you hear that? And obtained the totality where most of their elementary proteins are near large herbivores. In advance, the first modern humans presented a wider number of isotopic values and a certain number of individuals had the proofs of the consumption of aquatic resources. So, they studied the Neanderthalian Neanderthalian between 120,000 and 37,000 years before our era and the first modern humans between 40,000 and 27,000 years before our era. Our Neanderthalian Neanderthalian was at the carnivore. It's not least they said that they were scientists and the first modern humans were also carnivores because after the study, they had a large consumption of marine and odors. Here is their conclusion. The analysis of the Stable isotope is a powerful method to reconstruct some aspects of the elementary regime. And it is particularly useful to determine the source of proteins in the human-neanderthalian and modern countries in Europe. The Neanderthalian Neanderthalian and the first modern humans had similar adaptations, obtaining the most part of their proteins from animals to finish, everything that contradicts the fact that we are mainly constructed for animal products is more than 300,000 years of evolution. And we must not be naive to believe that we can turn 300,000 years of adaptation into only 10,000 years of agriculture and only 50 years of high-exposition to Glucide. It's a non-sense absolute. Human is not herbivore, human is not frugivore. Human is originally inspired with a very rich food production in animal products and our digestive adaptation, our gastric acidity, our evolutionary history, and isotopic data shows and tests an important consumption of animal food. As I told you, it remains once a nuance, we are certainly more oriented carnivores but we have an omnivore option. But the trend remains on carnivores. The omnivore option is depending on the tolerance of each one because many people do not tolerate the vegetals. And it will be translated by health problems, so we must not ignore this population. In reverse, I have never seen an intolerant in animal products. However, an intolerant in Glucide, an intolerant in the vegetals, this has a pharaminous quantity. The only case where you can be intolerant to the habit is when you make a certain tick, and that you take a disease, I don't know how to call it, but after you can't eat anymore. And you understand that it's a very particular case, provoked by an external thing. In the case, the ticker of the ticker. Once again, we do not talk about the same genetic pattern. So it's not because you support the Glucide or the vegetals that everyone supports, but what we know is that everyone supports animal products. Which is quite logical because we are built for it. So I work like that, the scientific effect first, and then the philosophical prism. So if you want to be vegetarian because you are suffering from the cause of the animal, ok, I have nothing against it. It's even super. Yes.