Trowel & Error

Trowel & Error

@trowelanderror

View on TikTok
1 transcribed video
Is it currently 1729, not 2026? According to the Phantom Time hypothesis (proposed by German writer Heribert Illig in 1991) 297 years of the early Middle Ages (614-911 CE) were fabricated by Pope Sylvester II and Holy Roman Emperor Otto III to align their reigns with the year 1000.  In the first installment of a new series I’m calling “Debunkology”, I explain Illig’s claim (a disputed reading of the 1582 Gregorian calendar reform) against the astronomical and geographical record. Sources & further reading below! • Illig, Heribert. Das erfundene Mittelalter: Die größte Zeitfälschung der Geschichte. Econ Verlag, 1996. Dutch, Stephen. “Is a Chunk of History Missing?” University of Wisconsin–Green Bay. stevedutch.net/pseudosc/phantom time.htm Mütz, Karl. “Die ‘Phantomzeit’ 614 bis 911 von Heribert Illig: Kalendertechnische und kalenderhistorische Einwände.” Zeitschrift für Württembergische Landesgeschichte 60 (2001): 11–23. (German works translated into English) • [phantom time hypothesis, Heribert Illig, is it really 2026, 297 missing years, missing years theory, medieval history conspiracy theory, did the Middle Ages happen, was Charlemagne real, Otto III Pope Sylvester II, early medieval history debunked, pseudohistory, pseudoarchaeology, historical conspiracy theories, Gregorian calendar reform explained, Julian calendar drift, Halley’s Comet historical record, medieval chronology, Das erfundene Mittelalter, history mythbusting, debunking conspiracy theories, historytok, calendar conspiracy theory] #History #medievalhistory #pseudohistory #mythbusting #phantomtimehypothesis
2:48

Is it currently 1729, not 2026? According to the Phantom Time hypothesis (proposed by German writer Heribert Illig in 1991) 297 years of the early Middle Ages (614-911 CE) were fabricated by Pope Sylvester II and Holy Roman Emperor Otto III to align their reigns with the year 1000. In the first installment of a new series I’m calling “Debunkology”, I explain Illig’s claim (a disputed reading of the 1582 Gregorian calendar reform) against the astronomical and geographical record. Sources & further reading below! • Illig, Heribert. Das erfundene Mittelalter: Die größte Zeitfälschung der Geschichte. Econ Verlag, 1996. Dutch, Stephen. “Is a Chunk of History Missing?” University of Wisconsin–Green Bay. stevedutch.net/pseudosc/phantom time.htm Mütz, Karl. “Die ‘Phantomzeit’ 614 bis 911 von Heribert Illig: Kalendertechnische und kalenderhistorische Einwände.” Zeitschrift für Württembergische Landesgeschichte 60 (2001): 11–23. (German works translated into English) • [phantom time hypothesis, Heribert Illig, is it really 2026, 297 missing years, missing years theory, medieval history conspiracy theory, did the Middle Ages happen, was Charlemagne real, Otto III Pope Sylvester II, early medieval history debunked, pseudohistory, pseudoarchaeology, historical conspiracy theories, Gregorian calendar reform explained, Julian calendar drift, Halley’s Comet historical record, medieval chronology, Das erfundene Mittelalter, history mythbusting, debunking conspiracy theories, historytok, calendar conspiracy theory] #History #medievalhistory #pseudohistory #mythbusting #phantomtimehypothesis

What if I told you that the year you're watching this isn't 2026, but 1729? Huh? In the 297 years in between, we're invented by a pope and an empe...

560.3K95.3KAug 22, 2026